Blog - LMS Digitalpathsala

Joe Wilson Joe Wilson

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

迷わずにこの一冊CAS-005問題集

ちなみに、PassTest CAS-005の一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wtrx4KmCmhxI4u-pxoUA289oPMb3nXFg

社会の発展と相対的な法律と規制の完成により、私たちのキャリア分野でのCAS-005証明書は私たちの国にとって必要になります。 CAS-005に合格して証明書を取得することが、あなたの立場を変えて目標を達成するための最も迅速で直接的な方法かもしれません。そして、私たちはあなたを助けるためにちょうどここにいます。このキャリアで最も本物のブランドと見なされているプロの専門家は、お客様に最新の有効なCAS-005試験シミュレーションを提供するために絶え間ない努力を行っています。

多くの受験生の反応によって、PassTestの模擬試験は全面的で質量が高いです。CompTIA試験は難しいですから、参考資料がないなら、試験に合格するのは簡単ではありません。我々の的中率が高くて安いCAS-005問題集を利用して試験に気楽に合格することができます。弊社の問題集がありましたら、易く成功できます。

>> CAS-005試験 <<

CAS-005日本語的中対策 & CAS-005学習指導

あなたは進歩を遂げたいですか。あなたはどのようにして勉強するのかわかりますか。この時、おそらく私たちのCAS-005試験準備資料の助けが必要でしょう。私たちのCAS-005試験準備資料を使用している人の99％がすでに望む証明書を持っていました。私たちのCAS-005試験準備資料を買う限り、あなたも成功できます！

CompTIA CAS-005 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

セキュリティ運用: このドメインは CompTIA セキュリティアーキテクト向けに設計されており、監視および対応活動をサポートするためのデータの分析、脆弱性の評価、攻撃対象領域を削減するためのソリューションの推奨などをカバーしています。候補者は脅威ハンティング技術を適用し、脅威インテリジェンスの概念を活用して運用セキュリティを強化します。

トピック 2

ガバナンス、リスク、コンプライアンス: この試験セクションでは、ポリシー、手順、標準の開発など、組織のセキュリティ要件に基づいたガバナンスコンポーネントの実装をカバーする CompTIA セキュリティアーキテクトのスキルを測定します。受験者は、フィッシングやソーシャルエンジニアリングに関する意識向上トレーニングなど、セキュリティプログラムの管理について学習します。

トピック 3

セキュリティエンジニアリング: このセクションでは、エンタープライズ環境内の ID およびアクセス管理 (IAM) コンポーネントに関連する一般的な問題のトラブルシューティングに関わる CompTIA セキュリティアーキテクトのスキルを評価します。受験者は、ハードウェアセキュリティテクノロジを実装しながら、エンドポイントとサーバーのセキュリティを強化するための要件を分析します。このドメインでは、システムのセキュリティ保護における高度な暗号化概念の重要性も強調します。

トピック 4

セキュリティアーキテクチャ: このドメインでは、ファイアウォールや侵入検知システムの構成を含む、回復力のあるシステムを設計するための要件の分析に重点を置いています。

CompTIA SecurityX Certification Exam 認定 CAS-005 試験問題 (Q194-Q199):

質問 # 194
An organization is looking for gaps in its detection capabilities based on the APTs that may target the industry Which of the following should the security analyst use to perform threat modeling?

A. OWASP
B. ATT&CK
C. CAPEC
D. STRIDE

正解：B

解説：
The ATT&CK (Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge) framework is the best tool for a security analyst to use for threat modeling when looking for gaps in detection capabilities based on Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) that may target the industry. Here's why:
Comprehensive Framework: ATT&CK provides a detailed and structured repository of known adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations. It helps organizations understand how attackers operate and what techniques they might use.
Gap Analysis: By mapping existing security controls against the ATT&CK matrix, analysts can identify which tactics and techniques are not adequately covered by current detection and mitigation measures.
Industry Relevance: The ATT&CK framework is continuously updated with the latest threat intelligence, making it highly relevant for industries facing APT threats. It provides insights into specific APT groups and their preferred methods of attack.
Reference:
CompTIA Security+ SY0-601 Study Guide by Mike Chapple and David Seidl
MITRE ATT&CK Framework Official Documentation
NIST Special Publication 800-150: Guide to Cyber Threat Information Sharing

質問 # 195
During a vulnerability assessment, a scan reveals the following finding:
Windows Server 2016 Missing hotfix KB87728 - CVSS 3.1 Score: 8.1 [High] - Affected host 172.16.15.2 Later in the review process, the remediation team marks the finding as a false positive. Which of the following is the best way toavoid this issue on future scans?

A. Getting an up-to-date list of assets from the CMDB
B. Configuring the sensor with an advanced policy for fingerprinting servers
C. Coordinating the scan execution with the remediation team early in the process
D. Performing an authenticated scan on the servers

正解：D

解説：
Authenticated scans allow the scanner to verify installed patches and configurations, reducing false positives.
Other options:
A (CMDB updates) improve asset tracking but do not validate patch installations.
C (Advanced fingerprinting) improves accuracy but does not replace authentication.
D (Coordination with teams) is good practice but does not prevent false positives.
Reference: CASP+ CAS-005 - Vulnerability Scanning and RiskManagement

質問 # 196
A security engineer wants to reduce the attack surface of a public-facing containerized application Which of the following will best reduce the application's privilege escalation attack surface?

A. Designing a muiticontainer solution, with one set of containers that runs the mam application, and another set oi containers that perform automatic remediation by replacing compromised containers or disabling compromised accounts
B. Implementing the following commands in the Dockerfile:RUN echo user:x:1000:1000iuser:/home/user:/dew/null > /ete/passwd
C. Running the container in an isolated network and placing a load balancer in a public-facing network.Adding the following ACL to the load balancer:PZRKZI HTTES from 0-0.0.0.0/0 pert 443
D. Installing an EDR on the container's host with reporting configured to log to a centralized SIFM and Implementing the followingalerting rules TF PBOCESS_USEB=rooC ALERT_TYPE=critical

正解：B

解説：
Implementing the given commands in the Dockerfile ensures that the container runs with non-root user privileges. Running applications as a non-root user reduces the risk of privilege escalation attacks because even if an attacker compromises the application, they would have limited privileges and would not be able to perform actions that require root access.
* A. Implementing the following commands in the Dockerfile: This directly addresses the privilege escalation attack surface by ensuring the application does not run with elevated privileges.
* B. Installing an EDR on the container's host: While useful for detecting threats, this does not reduce the privilege escalation attack surface within the containerized application.
* C. Designing a multi-container solution: While beneficial for modularity and remediation, it does not specifically address privilege escalation.
* D. Running the container in an isolated network: This improves network security but does not directly reduce the privilege escalation attack surface.
References:
* CompTIA Security+ Study Guide
* Docker documentation on security best practices
* NIST SP 800-190, "Application Container Security Guide"

質問 # 197
The security team is looking into aggressive bot behavior that is resulting in performance issues on the web server. After further investigation, the security engineer determines that the bot traffic is legitimate. Which of the following is the best course of action to reduce performance issues without allocating additional resources to the server?

A. Configure the WAF to rate-limit bot traffic.
B. Monitor legitimate SEO bot traffic for abnormalities.
C. Block all bot traffic using the IPS.
D. Update robots.txt to slow down the crawling speed.

正解：D

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Step by Step
Understanding the Scenario: The problem is legitimate bot traffic overloading the web server, causing performance issues. The goal is to mitigate this without adding more server resources.
Analyzing the Answer Choices:
A . Block all bot traffic using the IPS: This is too drastic. Blocking all bot traffic can negatively impact legitimate bots, like search engine crawlers, which are important for SEO.
Reference:
B . Monitor legitimate SEO bot traffic for abnormalities: Monitoring is good practice, but it doesn't actively solve the performance issue caused by the legitimate bots.
C . Configure the WAF to rate-limit bot traffic: Rate limiting is a good option, but it might be too aggressive if not carefully tuned. It could still impact the legitimate bots' ability to function correctly. A WAF is better used to identify and block malicious traffic.
D . Update robots.txt to slow down the crawling speed: This is the most appropriate solution. The robots.txt file is a standard used by websites to communicate with web crawlers (bots). It can specify which parts of the site should not be crawled and, crucially in this case, suggest a crawl delay.
Why D is the Correct answer:
robots.txt provides a way to politely request that well-behaved bots reduce their crawling speed. The Crawl-delay directive can be used to specify a delay (in seconds) between successive requests.
This approach directly addresses the performance issue by reducing the load caused by the bots without completely blocking them or requiring complex WAF configurations.
CASP+ Relevance: This solution aligns with the CASP+ focus on understanding and applying web application security best practices, managing risks associated with web traffic, and choosing appropriate controls based on specific scenarios.
How it works (elaboration based on web standards and security practices) robots.txt: This file is placed in the root directory of a website.
Crawl-delay directive: Crawl-delay: 10 would suggest a 10-second delay between requests.
Respectful Bots: Legitimate search engine crawlers (like Googlebot) are designed to respect the directives in robots.txt.
In conclusion, updating the robots.txt file to slow down the crawling speed is the best solution in this scenario because it directly addresses the issue of aggressive bot traffic causing performance problems without blocking legitimate bots or requiring significant configuration changes. It is a targeted and appropriate solution aligned with web security principles and CASP+ objectives.

質問 # 198
After a cybersecurity incident, a security analyst was able to collect a binary that the attacker used on the compromised server. Then the analyst ran the following command:

Which of the following options describes what the analyst is trying to do?

A. To debug the binary to analyze low-level instructions
B. To extract IoCs from the binary used on the attack
C. To reconstruct the timeline of commands executed by the binary
D. To replicate the attack in a secure environment

正解：B

質問 # 199
......

クライアントがトレントのCAS-005質問を購入する前に、ダウンロードして自由に試してみることができます。製品のページはデモを提供します。目的は、購入前にクライアントにタイトルの一部を知らせ、CAS-005ガイドトレントがどのようなものであるかを知らせることです。このページでは、CAS-005ガイドトレントの質問と回答の量を紹介しています。無料デモを試してみると、CAS-005試験トレントが購入する価値があるかどうかを判断できます。PassTestしたがって、お金を無駄にする心配はありません。また、CAS-005試験の急流は役に立たず、価値を高めません。

CAS-005日本語的中対策: https://www.passtest.jp/CompTIA/CAS-005-shiken.html

さらに、PassTest CAS-005ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wtrx4KmCmhxI4u-pxoUA289oPMb3nXFg